Biopolym. Cell. 1997; 13(4):303-307.
Cell Biology
The peculiarities of regeneration of plants of inbred lines of sugar heel cultured in vitro
1Chugunkova T. V., 1Dubrovnaya O. V.
  1. Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine
    31/17, Vasylkivska, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022


Regenerated plants ware obtained from cultures of petiole with leaf and calluses of the inbred lines of sugar beet. The reliable and reproducable technology for receiving high frequency shoot regeneration was worked out.


[1] Bormotov BB, Dolbik AM. Callus formation on leaf explants inbred sugar beet Proc Intern Conf "Biology of cultured cells and biotechnology." Novosibirsk. 1988:17.
[2] Bormotov VV, Svirtsevskaya AM. Somaclonal variation sugar beet plants. Proc. Dokl. All-Union. Conf. Genetics of somatic cells in culture, in memory of II. Shapiro. Zvenigorod, 1989;102.
[3] Zhuzhzhalova TP, Znamenskaya VV. Effect of genotype and culture medium on the process of micropropagation of sugar beet. Proc Intern Conf "Biology of cultured cells and biotechnology." Novosibirsk. 1990:159-60.
[4] De Greef W, Jacobs M. In vitro culture of the sugarbeet: Description of a cell line with high regeneration capacity. Plant Science Letters.1979;17(1):55–61.
[5] Detrez C, Tetu T, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norreel BS. Direct organogenesis from petiole and thin cell layer explants in sugar beet cultured in Vitro . J Exp Bot. 1988;39(7):917–26.
[6] Doley WP, Saunders JW. Hormone-free medium will support callus production and subsequent shoot regeneration from whole plant leaf explants in some sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) populations. Plant Cell Rep. 1989;8(4):222-5.
[7] Freytag AH, Anand SC, Rao-Arelli AP, Owens LD. An improved medium for adventitious shoot formation and callus induction in Beta vulgaris L. in vitro. Plant Cell Rep. 1988;7(1):30-4.
[8] Kubalakova M. Somatic embryogenesis and cytoplasmic sterility in Beta vulgaris L. var.saccharifera. Biol Plant. 1990;32(6):414–9.
[9] Mikami T, Jana J, Kinoshita T. Plant regeneration from leaf discs of sugar beet and wild beets. Proc. Jap. Soc. Sugarbeet Technol. 1988. 30: 108-112.
[10] Mikami T, Sudoh R, Nagao E, Kinoshita T. Genotypic variation in the in vitro morphogenesis from leaf explants of Beta vulgaris L. and B. maritima L. Euphytica. 1989; 40(3):271-3.
[11] Saunders JW, Doley WP. One step shoot regeneration from callus of whole plant leaf explants of sugarbeet lines and a somaclonal variant for in vitro Behavior. J Plant Physiol. 1986;124(5):473–9.
[12] Pausheva ZP. Practicum on cytology rasteniy. M : Kolos, 1980:168-70.
[13] Chugunkova TV, Yurkova GI, Rozumna LF, Shevtsov IA. Regeneration ability of the varieties and breeding samples of fodder beet. Fiziologiia i biokhimiia kul'turnykh rasteniy. 1994; 26(6):572-5.
[14] Cavallini A, Cremonini R, Lupi MC, Bennici A. In vitro culture of Bellevalia romana (L.) Rchb. Protoplasma. 1986;132(1-2):58–63.
[15] Linacero R, Vazquez AM. Cytogenetic variation in rye regenerated plants and their progeny. Genome. 1992;35(3):428–30.
[16] Cellarova E, Rychlova M, Honcariv R. Cytological instability in Matricaria chamomilla L. tissue cultures. Herba hung. 1984; 24(3):37-51.