Biopolym. Cell. 2026; 42(Special Issue):21.
Recombinant protein and antibody engineering
Effective production of human EGF and VEGF in Escherichia coli
1Skvarchynskyi A. I., 1, 2, 3Usenko M. O., 1, 2, 3Gorbatiuk O. B., 4Kolybo D. V., 1, 2, 3Kordium V. A.
  1. Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine
    150, Akademika Zabolotnoho Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03143
  2. Institute of Genetic and Regenerative Medicine,
    M.D. Strazhesko National Scientific Center of Cardiology,
    Clinical and Regenerative Medicine, NAMS of Ukraine
    5, Sviatoslava Khorobroho Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03151
  3. State Institute of Genetic and Regenerative Medicine, NAMS of Ukraine
    67, Vyshhorodska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04114
  4. O.V. Palladin Institute of Biochemistry, NAS of Ukraine
    9, Leontovycha Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01054

Abstract

Background/Aim. Recombinant Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (rhVEGF) and Epidermal Growth Factor (rhEGF) are extremely important for biomedical research and regenerative medicine. The bacterial expression systems offer a cost-effective platform for their production; however, achievement of soluble, biologically active forms remains a significant challenge. The aim was to develop and optimize the E. coli-based expression systems for rhVEGF and rhEGF and to obtain both proteins in soluble, active form. Methods. Target genes were cloned into the pET-24b vector and expressed in E. coli BL21 Rosetta (DE3). Two expression induction methods, IPTG-mediated induction and autoinduction, were tested and compared for each recombinant protein. The expression profiles were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Purification of rhEGF-His and rhVEGF-His was achieved by metal-affinity chromatography; while tag-free rhEGF was purified by ion-exchange chromatography. Biological activity of both purified rhEGF variants was assessed using a 3T3 fibroblast cell viability assay. Results. Both induction approaches enabled successful expression of rhVEGF and rhEGF. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that autoinduction at 37°C yielded a higher proportion of soluble rhVEGF compared to IPTG-based induction. In contrast, IPTG-based induction at 30°C was more effective for soluble rhEGF production. Assessment of biological activity using 3T3 fibroblasts demonstrated that both purified rhEGF preparations remained functional, with the non-tagged protein promoting cell viability approximately 30% more effectively than the His-tagged form. Conclusions. Autoinduction at 37°C is the preferred strategy for production of soluble rhVEGF in the pET-24b/BL21 Rosetta system, whereas IPTG-based induction at 30°C is more suitable for rhEGF. The successful expression and purification of rhEGF in two distinct forms were achieved, and both variants retained biological activity. The non-tagged protein demonstrated greater bioactivity than the His-tagged counterpart. These results provide a basis for scalable bacterial production of clinically relevant recombinant growth factors.
Keywords: VEGF, EGF, Escherichia coli, autoinduction, IPTG, pET-24b, protein purification, biological activity